When it comes to weapons in video games, bigger is always better. At least that's what the masses seem to think. Seriously, how many times have you watched a Christmas Noob run around Operation Metro, spamming hip-fire rounds from their Type 88 LMG? Don't bother trying to count, because it's a lot. The funny part is, most of the time they find themselves getting owned by someone melting faces with their tiny little MP7 Sub Machine Gun.
Head Back to the Free Prima Games Dragon's Teeth Guide
Well, sometimes bigger is actually better, at least in the case of one of the brand new pistols available with the Battlefield 4 Dragon's Teeth DLC. Enter the Deagle 44. Capable of one-shot headshot kills, as well as massive damage in just about any circumstance, people are comparing it to the .44 Magnum. What sets these two powerful pistols apart, however, is that the Deagle 44 doesn't have a delay when you pull the trigger, and actually carries three more rounds if you count the one in the chamber.
Basically, the Deagle 44 not only promises to be a popular gun due to pop culture, it actually seems that it might have the chops to be a real contender in the Battlefield 4 sidearm division. Now that we've convinced you of why you want it, here's how you can get it.
As with most new weapons released via DLC, the Deagle 44 has to be unlocked by completing an assignment. Actually, you have to complete an assignment just to unlock the assignment you have to complete.
Your first step involves tackling Big Splash, an assignment that requires you to activate the floodgates on the Sunken Dragon map, as well as get 5 kills while swimming. Neither of those should be too hard, but you also have to keep in mind that everyone is trying to do the same thing.
Note: The floodgates are activated near the C point on the Chain Link game mode (pictured above). In fact, even on Conquest Large the C flag is in almost exactly the same place. Head to the large building next to the dam. Go up the two flights of stairs and you'll find the controls for the gate in a room at the top.
When it comes to activating the floodgates, our experience in five or six games of Sunken Dragon is that this is all anyone tries to do. Without exaggeration, we have never been alone in the room with the floodgates, even seeing as many as seven teammates standing around trying to do the same thing we were. This is complicated by the fact you can't just activate the gates an unlimited number of times. Once the gates are raised or lowered, they will enter a cool down period before it can be done again. This makes for some intense firefights at this location while everyone battles for position. As a final note, while we haven't tried to interact with the floodgates on all game modes, we have yet to get them working on anything except Conquest Large. That's not to say regular Conquest (or even Rush) won't work, we just haven't been able to try it as of yet.
Getting the five kills while swimming should be much easier. Just keep in mind, this is while swimming, not just while in the water. You can't stand up or it won't count. The strange thing is, there is only one Dragon's Teeth map that has enough water to make this easy, and that's Lumphini Garden (unless the Sunken Dragon floodgates are open). Even then, in a round of Chain Link, we were only able to get three kills, but just as easily could have gotten zero. To finish this portion of the assignment, we took our soldier to flood zone and banged it out in about five minutes using the SW40 Pistol. You can also C4 vehicles that are in the water, or even knife other soldiers swimming in the area. Either way, when this assignment is done you will have unlocked the Unica 6 pistol, an integral part of the next one.
Once the first assignment is down, Recoil Kinetics is next. This one might take awhile, but it's fairly straightforward. You must reach a rank of 10, but your only true test is to get 20 headshots using the Unica 6. If you're not trying to do this, it could take days or even weeks to pull off. However, if you want to speed things along, we suggest hopping into a game of Team Deathmatch and going to work. In fact, don't even run around with your Unica 6 out. Play the game as you normally would, waiting until you see an opportunity for the pistol headshot. It might take longer, but your kill to death ratio should stay intact, and you won't destroy any controllers by whipping them across the room. Not that we would ever do such a thing.
Upon completing both assignments, and with the Unica 6 and Deagle 44 in hand, the only thing left to do is decide which one is your favorite. For that, why not have a peek at the LevelCap video that we embedded below. He does a nice job summarizing exactly what you can expect from each one.
1. Krehenwinkel H, Rödder D, Tautz D. Eco‐Genomic analysis of the poleward range expansion of the wasp spider Argiope bruennichi shows rapid adaptation and genomic admixture. Global Change biology. 2015;21:4320–4332. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13042.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
2. Meier R, Wong W, Srivathsan A, Foo M. $1 DNA barcodes for reconstructing complex phenomes and finding rare species in specimen‐rich samples. Cladistics. 2016;32:100–110. doi: 10.1111/cla.12115.[Cross Ref]
3. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E. Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Molecular ecology. 2012;21:2045–2050. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
4. Leray M, Knowlton N. DNA barcoding and metabarcoding of standardized samples reveal patterns of marine benthic diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112:2076–2081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424997112.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
5. Gibson J, et al. Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111:8007–8012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406468111.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
6. Ji Y, et al. Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. Ecology letters. 2013;16:1245–1257. doi: 10.1111/ele.12162.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
7. Krehenwinkel, H., Kennedy, S., Pekár, S., & Gillespie, R. G. A cost‐efficient and simple protocol to enrich prey DNA from extractions of predatory arthropods for large‐scale gut content analysis by Illumina sequencing. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. (2017).
8. Shokralla, S. et al. Massively parallel multiplex DNA sequencing for specimen identification using an Illumina MiSeq platform. Scientific reports. 5 (2015). [PMC free article][PubMed]
9. Shokralla S, Spall JL, Gibson JF, Hajibabaei M. Next‐generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research. Molecular ecology. 2012;21:1794–1805. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05538.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
10. Kress WJ, García-Robledo C, Uriarte M, Erickson DL. DNA barcodes for ecology, evolution, and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2015;30:25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.008.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
11. Elbrecht V, Leese F. Can DNA-based ecosystem assessments quantify species abundance? Testing primer bias and biomass—sequence relationships with an innovative metabarcoding protocol. PloS one. 2015;10:e0130324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130324.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
12. Stadhouders R, et al. The effect of primer-template mismatches on the detection and quantification of nucleic acids using the 5′ nuclease assay. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 2010;12:109–117. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090035.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
13. Bensasson D, Zhang DX, Hartl DL, Hewitt GM. Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution’s misplaced witnesses. Trends in ecology & evolution. 2001;16:314–321. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02151-6.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
14. Angly FE, et al. CopyRighter: a rapid tool for improving the accuracy of microbial community profiles through lineage-specific gene copy number correction. Microbiome. 2014;2:1. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-11.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
15. Aird D, et al. Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries. Genome biology. 2011;12:1. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-r18.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
16. Polz MF, Cavanaugh CM. Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR. Applied and environmental Microbiology. 1998;64:3724–3730.[PMC free article][PubMed]
17. Gotelli NJ, Chao A. Measuring and estimating species richness, species diversity, and biotic similarity from sampling data. In Levin S, ed, Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Waltham, MA, USA 195–211 (2013)
18. Saitoh S, et al. A quantitative protocol for DNA metabarcoding of springtails (Collembola) 1. Genome. 2016;59:705–723. doi: 10.1139/gen-2015-0228.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
19. Tang M, et al. High‐throughput monitoring of wild bee diversity and abundance via mitogenomics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015;6:1034–1043. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12416.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
20. Hebert PD, Ratnasingham S, de Waard JR. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2003;270:96–99. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
21. Drummond AJ, et al. Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment. GigaScience. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0086-1.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
22. Clarke LJ, Soubrier J, Weyrich LS, Cooper A. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias. Molecular ecology resources. 2014;14:1160–1170. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12265.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
23. Deagle BE, Jarman SN, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match. Biology letters. 2014;10:20140562. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0562.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
24. Elbrecht V, et al. Testing the potential of a ribosomal 16S marker for DNA metabarcoding of insects. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1966. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1966.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
25. Tang CQ, et al. The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109:16208–16212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209160109.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
26. Ratnasingham, S., & Hebert, P. D. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular ecology notes. 7, 355–364 (2007). [PMC free article][PubMed]
27. Yu DW, et al. Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2012;3:613–623. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x.[Cross Ref]
28. Suzuki MT, Giovannoni SJ. Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR. Applied and environmental microbiology. 1996;62:625–630.[PMC free article][PubMed]
29. Dowle EJ, Pochon X, C Banks J, Shearer K, Wood SA. Targeted gene enrichment and high‐throughput sequencing for environmental biomonitoring: a case study using freshwater macroinvertebrates. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2016;16:1240–1254. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12488.